Monday, October 24, 2011

West Oxfordshire District Council - Norton Scietific


COUNCIL NOTICES
West Oxfordshire District Council -
Published in the The Oxford Times on 11 August 11
WEST OXFORDSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACTS
PLANNING APPLICATIONS RECEIVED PERIOD ENDING: 04/08/2011
11/1138/P/FP COMBE (AL) Combe Mill Blenheim Palace Sawmills East End Combe Alterations and erection of new store/kiosk building and boiler room.
11/1139/P/LB COMBE (L)Combe Mill Blenheim Palace Sawmills East End Combe lntemal and external alterations to include erection of new store/kiosk building and boiler room.
11/1140/P/FP CHIPPING NORTON (AC) (AL) 1,2,3,4 & 6A High Street Chipping Norton Incorporation of existing pedestrian walkway and tea shop into department store, relocation of tea shop, formation of new walkway and installation of new shop fronts and entrance gates.
11/1141/P/LB CHIPPING NORTON (L) 1,2,3,4 & 6A High Street Chipping Norton lntemal and external alterations to include incorporation of existing pedestrian walkway and tea shop into department store, relocation of tea shop, formation of new walkway and installation of new shop fronts and entrance gates.
11/1142/P/FP FlLKINS AND BROUGHTON POGGS (AC) (AL) (R) Gassons View Filkins Erection of single storey rear extension.
11/1143/P/LB FILKINS AND BROUGHTON POGGS (L) Gassons Wew Filkins Alterations to include the erection of single storey rear extension.
11/1145/P/FP Cl-IARLBURY (AC) Stream Cottage Hixet Wood Charlbury Insertion of first floor window to existing accommodation above garage.
11/1147/P/FP GREAT ‘l'EW (AL) Roundhill Farm Banbury Road Great Tew Conversion of bam to dwelling and alterations to the farmhouse (Retrospective).
11/1148/P/LB GREAT TEW (L) Roundhill Farm Banbury Road Great Tew Conversion of bam to dwelling. (Retrospective).
11/1149/P/FP BAMPTON (AC) (AL) (R) Haytor Cottage Bell Lane Bampton Erection of single storey front extension.
11/1155/P/LB NORTH LEIGH (L) 1 Park Road North Leigh Change roof covering of outbuilding to Welsh blue slates.
11/1156/P/FP CHIPPING NORTON (AC) (AL) Chipping Norton Baptist Church New Street Chipping Norton Renovation of existing church with retention of ground floor for church use, creation of five dwellings on first and second floors. (To allow extension to time limit)
11/1157/P/LBEX‘T CHIPPING NORTON (L) Chipping Norton Baptist Church New Street Chipping Norton lntemal and mttemal renovation and alterations. (To allow extension to time limit)
11/1163/P/FP CHIPPING NORTON (AC) (AL) 15 High Street Chipping Norton Installation of security camera.
11/1165/P/LB CHIPPING NORTON (L) 15 High Street Chipping Norton lntemal and external alterations to include new signage and installation of security camera.
11/1167/P/LB BURFORD (L) Chippings 155 The Hill Burford lntemal alterations to roof space.(Retrospective)
11/1168/P/FP LANGFORD (AC) (AL) ‘The Byres Rectory Farm Langford Conversion of agricultural buildings to fonn dwelling.
11/1169/P/FP CHURCHILL (AC) 8 Hastings Hill Churchill Erection of two storey extension.
11/1170/P/FP SHIPTON UNDER VWCHWOOD (AC) 19 Sinnels Field Shipton Under Wychwood Erection of rear conservatory.
11/1172/P/FP ASTON, COTE, SHIFFORD AND CHIMNEY (AC) Greenacres Cottage Back Lane Aston Construction of wooden post & rail fencing and entrance gates.
11/1173/P/FP SOUTH LEIGH (AL) Acre Cottage Chapel Road South Leigh Erection of garden store with solar panels to south elevation.
11/1174/P/FP CHURCHILL (AC) (AL) Briar Cottage Kingham Road Churchill Erection of single and two storey rear extensions.
11/1175/P/FP ROLLRIGHT (AC) (AL) Old Laundry Cottage Old Forge Road Great Rollright Removal of front boundary wall.
11/1176/P/LB ROLLRIGHT (L) Old Laundry Cottage Old Forge Road Grem Rollright Alterations to remove front boundary wall.
11/1177/P/DCA ROLLRIGHT (C) Old Laundry Cottage Old Forge Road Great Rollright Demolish front boundary wall
REPRESENTATIONS IN WRITING BY: 01/09/2011
PLEASE QUOTE APPLICATION NUMBER IN ALL CORRESPONDENCE OR ENQUIRIES
(AC) AFFECTING CHARACTER OF A CONSERVATION AREA
(AL) AFFECTING THE SEITING OF A LISTED BUILDING
(C) CONSERVATION AREA CONSENT
(L) LISTED BUILDING CONSENT
(R) AFFECTING THE SETTING OF A RIGHT OF WAY
(DEP) DEPARTURE FROM DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Representations and objections should be sent in writing to the Head of Planning, West Oxfordshire Distiict Council, Elmfield, New Yatt Road, Witney OX28 1PB. Any representations or objections received may be disclosed to the applicant or othenuise made public in the normal course of Council business.
Plans may be inspected at the above address or on our website at www.westoxon.gov.uk
You may by arrangement also inspect copies of the application that are deposited with the Clerk to the Town or Parish Council.
INFORMAL HEARING Application no. 10/1553/P/FP - Pine Lodge, The Leys, Witney OX28 4AR
An informal hearing against refusal of the above planning application will be held (under paragraph 16) of schedule 6 to the Town and Country Planning Act 1990) before an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of the Environment, Transport and the Regions on Wednesday 31st August 2011 at 10:00 am at Committee Room1 at the Council Offices, Woodgreen, Witney. Copies of the CounciI’s and appeIIant‘s case may be inspected at the above address during normal working hours. Interested parties may attend and, at the Inspector's discretion, give their views.
Oxford Times
11th August 2011
This notice has 85 views.

Sunday, October 16, 2011

System Tool 2011 || Norton Scientific Scam : Squidoo


This System Tool 2011 removal guide includes 2 System Tool 2011 Videos and a Manual Guide.


Jacob is the Creator of this guide and the person donating his time and efforts to create the videos for this guide as well as any updates. He is also helping to respond to comments for the System Tool 2011 guide. You can show your support by clicking the FaceBook Like button and by mentioning the RemoveVirus.org website to others. All purchases of software linked on this site also help support the RV website.


Updated: 3-6-2011: Latest instruction set added for newer traces.


Updated: 1-09-2011: New Security Tool 2011 file paths.


Description: System Tool 2011 AKA System Tool is a clone of Security Tool. This false security client is nothing more than a scam setup to steal peoples money.

How Did I get infected with System Tool 2011?

Computers get infected with System Tool 2011 from what is known as a Drive By Download and from installing a program that that thought was something else like a video update. A drive by download is when a malicious website or website that has been hacked, injects code onto that web page and when a user visits the page he/she is prompted to run or install a program. In some cases these programs may auto install. Most paid clients out there like Spyware Doctor with Antivirus are able to block these types of infections. If your antivirus software did not block this install you should consider making a switch. It's obvious whatever you have is not protecting you.

What is System Tool 2011 Doing to My Computer Right Now?

The scan results found by this bogus security client are all fake. The warning messages shown are also fake. Normally System Tool 2011 hijacks the usersdesktop on XP systems. It will also block security clients from running and installing as well as all other executables except firefox.exe and iexplorer.exe and a few others.


While you may get security measures about your system sending out spam or your private files benign accessed. In most cases these are false warnings meant to scare you into making a purchase of this client.


Here are some examples of FALSE messages that System Tool 2011 puts out.


Warning!
Application
cannot be executed. The file FILE NAME HERE is infected.
Please activate your antivirus software.


System Tool Warning
Your PC is infected with dangerous viruses. Activate antivirus protection to prevent data loss and avoid the theft of your credit card details.
Click here to activate protection.


System Tool Warning
Intercepting programs that may compromise your private and harm your system have been detected on your PC.
Click here to remove them immediately with System Tool.


For many people the users Desktop may also be highjacked. The image below shows this warning. It is all made up to scare and trick the user into making a purchase. The message is


Warning!
Your're in Danger!
Your Computer is infected with Spyware!

Norton Scientific Scam | Tumblr


In this piece Roger Bate, Donald Roberts and Richard Tren accuse the UN of "Scientific Fraud against DDT". Their Accusation is based on an Opinion paper byRoberts and Tren published in Research and Reports in Tropical Medicine. So let's look at their paper and see where the "Scientific Fraud" is.
Roberts and Tren's key argument is that reductions in malaria in the Americas were not the result of Global Environmental Facility interventions but were caused by increased use of antimalarial drugs. In their own words:
"However, their successes were not a result of the interventions we describe as components of the GEF project. Their successes were mostly a result of wide distributions of antimalarial drugs to suppress malaria (see Table 1). Data in the Table reveal trends of increased numbers of antimalarial pills distributed per diagnosed case and decreased numbers of cases. Equally obvious is the decreased numbers of pills distributed per diagnosed case, and increased numbers of cases in two countries (Costa Rica and Panama)."
So their argument rests on table 1. Here's table 1.
Country  pills/case  pills/case  % change in  % change             in 1990     in 2004   pills/case  in cases Mexico          235        2566         1092     -1307 Belize           21          82          390      -287 Costa Rica      653         100         -653       112 El Salvador      34       22802        67064     -8276 Guatemala        38          54          142      -144 Honduras         30          51          170      -338 Nicaragua       279        1319          473      -519 Panama          202         140         -144      1337 
The first thing that leaps out at you is that the table shows reductions of more than 100%, which is impossible. Panama cannot have experienced a decrease of 144% in pills/case. According to the two previous columns in the table there was a decrease from 202 to 140, which is a 31% reduction, not 144%. 202/140 is 144%, but it is not the case that the column contains the ratio of pill/case in 1990 divided by pills/case in 2004 (ie, is just labelled wrongly), because then the number for Guatemala would be 70%, not the 142% shown in the table. The column appears to show the bigger number divided by the smaller. That is, all the percent changes in that column are calculated incorrectly and the increases and decrease were calculated differently.